For example: I can design the most modern building with the latest software or the most expensive or the most powerful, but what happens if I save each file I have with the name that comes to my mind? (the typical thing that happens when there are changes in the versions"casa-perez_final_bueno_ok_okdefinitivo.dgn").It turns out that if I do not clarify myself with the version of the design, surely the version of plans suitable for construction will not arrive at the construction site or they will not know what it is. Even assuming that it was super organized and had strict control over my files, each actor involved in a project goes their own way, each one looks after their own process and interests and, although this is legitimate, we do not look after the project and, consequently, we neglect the interests of our client. Therefore, although I use the most modern tools in the global world,the process of the asset to be built (house, hotel, apartments, offices, shopping center, etc.) is exactly the same as it was 2,000 years ago:

​

1.  The architect designsyour process can be anything from the sketch on a napkin to the most expensive virtual reality software on the market.

​

two.  When finished it is sent toengineer to calculate the structure and since it is an office "as God intended" it uses all the technology in vogue although it is totally on its own.

​

3.  When the structuralist finishes, the facilities enter,a parade of contractors, each with their specialty; waiting until the other finishes their engineering to start theirs. Believe me that in medium-sized projects you rarely have the luck of being a single designer and, even if the kind reader were to run with that enormous luck, exactly the same thing is repeated as with the structural designer, each one goes to their own.

​

4.   After a long "raffle raffle" between all the aforementioned and a client on the verge of a nervous breakdown, the long-awaited stage of construction finally begins.

​

5.  Then the work begins and probably the only one who follows from the initial project team is the architect. All the other designers have been paid and have left. The client thinks that since he has hired the most technical offices, his project will flow like water, he could not be more wrong.The problems begin:the installations cross by beams, columns or slabs, architecture does not coincide with structure, the polygon of the land does not coincide, the project begins to change as the work progresses. Contractors and subcontractors come and go when they have finished their work and history repeats itself, each one goes their own way. In short, a true Way of the Cross for the poor client.